rkhaut1@gmail.com | ||
---|---|---|
↕ Name | Return | Period |
Red Sea Changes | ||
↑ HLAG.DE | 29.0% | 12.14.23 → 01.02.24 |
↑ AMKBY | 19.4% | 12.14.23 → 01.02.24 |
↑ ZIM | 37.0% | 12.14.23 → 01.02.24 |
Houthi attacks forcing ships to reroute around Africa will remove 15-30% of effective container capacity from the market, creating a supply shock that should drive ZIM, Hapag-Lloyd, and Maersk shares 15-30% higher as carriers announce official Suez Canal avoidance policies. The escalation from targeted strikes on Israeli vessels to indiscriminate attacks on all commercial shipping transforms a regional conflict into a global logistics crisis, adding 3-4 weeks to Asia-Europe voyages and recreating the pandemic-era container shortage that drove freight rates to record highs, with the market yet to fully price in this sudden capacity crunch. | ||
ThesisRecent attacks on commercial vessels in the Red Sea by Houthi rebels are set to significantly disrupt global shipping routes, forcing carriers to bypass the Suez Canal. This rerouting around Africa will increase voyage times, restrict effective container supply, and drive freight rates higher. The historically inelastic demand for shipping, coupled with this sudden supply shock, presents a compelling investment opportunity in key container shipping stocks, specifically ZIM (ZIM), Hapag-Lloyd (HLAG.DE), and Maersk (MAERSK-B.CO).
TimelineThe crisis has escalated from targeted attacks on Israeli-linked assets to a broader threat against all international shipping in the Bab el-Mandeb strait.
ValuationBased on the current volatility and historical price action, we can establish a rough valuation floor and ceiling for this trade.
CatalystThe primary catalyst is the official rerouting of fleets by major carriers. While some diversions are already occurring, the attack on the Maersk Gibraltar is a watershed moment. As Maersk, Hapag-Lloyd, and other major lines formally announce they will avoid the Suez Canal for the foreseeable future, the market will be forced to price in the resulting supply constriction and higher operating revenues. This move from risk assessment to official policy is the inevitable trigger for a re-rating of shipping equities.
Risks
| ||